It's hard to explain, but to try to sum it up: We tend to think the best of people we like and give them the benefit of a doubt with whatever they do, but with someone we don't like we do the opposite, and tend to assume the absolute worst of intentions with everything they do.

For example: If someone we like likes Thing X, we think "Oh, well of course they like Thing X! Thing X is awesome and so are they!", but with someone we don't like, it's more like "Ugh, of course they'd like Thing X, fuckin' asshole.".

Like with people we like, we're more willing to overlook their flaws, while with people we don't like, even if said flaws are basically the same, we only focus on them in their case.

It's kinda like that Parenti quote about capitalists always assuming the worst with everything communists do, even if it's the most benign shit in actuality, but applied to individuals instead.

Not trying to make any sort of larger statement political or otherwise really, or to act like this is a groundbreaking discovery of the human psyche, this is just something that's been on my mind for a while and wanted to get it out somehow.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Blockocheese@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago

This is something I try really hard to fight against doing.

I grew up (and am unfortunately still trapped in) a really dysfunctional family and know what it feels like for people to assume the worst just because its you and I dont want to continue it. On the flip side, also know what it's like for something objectively awful to be excused because of who's doing it

Focusing on the action/belief/whatever rather than the person is something I've had to train myself to do but I like the person I am a lot more now that I'm more fair, even when its giving shitty people the benefit of the doubt or holding my loved ones accountable.

Something something Mao something something first type of liberalism