this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
706 points (86.5% liked)

Political Humor

1290 readers
40 users here now

Welcome to Political Humor!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (4 children)
[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

God, you liberals are disgusting scum. MLK was right about you, you are the greatest threat to justice.

[–] franklin@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Rather than being sanctimonious why not give some actionable advice.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ok, how about this. The way you’ve been doing things? Don’t do that.

[–] franklin@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Typical, always there to tell people how it should be, completely detached from consequences

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 8 months ago

Yes, that’s typically how democrats are, but this time I think you’re gonna experience them with us. You’ll finally get a taste of that solidarity you’re always going on about from the comfort of your couch. See you on the protest line, comrade.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I’m think you’re missing the point.

You face three choices:

  1. Most death and harm, 50% chance of happening
  2. Less death and harm, 50% chance of happening
  3. Principled choice for no death and harm, but that practically makes choice 1 more likely to happen because it has 0 chance of happening.

Choosing choice 3 is equivalent to choosing choice 1 because you’re contributing to choice 1 happening practically.

Choosing choice 3 is directly creating more death and harm than choosing choice 2 and in that way is morally worse.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Libs would rather make fun of their genocide that they're funding than resist it.

That's literally why nobody votes for y'all creeps.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I’m think you’re missing the point.

You face three choices:

  1. Most death and harm, 50% chance of happening
  2. Less death and harm, 50% chance of happening
  3. Principled choice for no death and harm, but that practically makes choice 1 more likely to happen because it has 0 chance of happening.

Choosing choice 3 is equivalent to choosing choice 1 because you’re contributing to choice 1 happening practically.

Choosing choice 3 is directly creating more death and harm than choosing choice 2 and in that way is morally worse.

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why should we accept genocide as normal? I don’t get it? Is it because it is happening to Arabs?

At least now we know many Democratic voters are just as racist as Republican voters just tacit about it

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I’m think you’re missing the point.

You face three choices:

  1. Most death and harm, 50% chance of happening
  2. Less death and harm, 50% chance of happening
  3. Principled choice for no death and harm, but that practically makes choice 1 more likely to happen because it has 0 chance of happening.

Choosing choice 3 is equivalent to choosing choice 1 because you’re contributing to choice 1 happening practically.

Choosing choice 3 is directly creating more death and harm than choosing choice 2 and in that way is morally worse.