this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
658 points (99.5% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !historyphotos@piefed.social

7345 readers
1 users here now

COMM MOVED TO !historyphotos@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grandkaiser@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago (1 children)

From an engineering standpoint, liquid fuels have a far greater energy-to-weight ratio than batteries. Some of the largest advancements in combustion engines for the purpose of conveyance were made during the world wars. Noise was something they actively fought against. Loud tanks are scary, but unexpected tanks are much scarier. If they really needed it to be loud, sirens exist (see: Jericho siren). The energy-to-weight problem is only now finally being solved via modern batteries using exotic materials and processes well outside of early 1900's technology.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's the textbook answer but I think mine is more fun.

[–] grandkaiser@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh certainly! I only felt the need to add the textbook answer because of the... Conspiratorial side of Lemmy that will happily believe misleading information as long as it confirms pre-existing biases.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's too late, I've already accepted the other response as accurate gospel