this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
146 points (95.6% liked)

Fuck AI

3126 readers
371 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
146
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by IrregularChore@lemm.ee to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
 

Back reads "Delve into the CTZN experience, where A.I. unites with the artistry of traditional winemaking. Luminous drift captures this perfect fusion, a wine expertly crafted by A.I. algorithms and refined by a vintner's touch to invigorate your palate with its bright, fresh, and lifted elegance"

.......Discuss

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 36 points 4 months ago (13 children)

Because if there’s one thing we know about algorithms, it’s that they have an amazing sense of taste…

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (12 children)

While I agree that algorithms and taste are not compatible (yet), there is undeniably a benefit in using some in certain processes of wine making:

There are machines that can control wine oxygen saturation way better than a person, making the wine oxidation much more controlled.

There are so many processes other than that in which you can exploit algorithms to make better wine, and many of them are not aimed at removing the person from the job but rather to making their work easier.

I worked for a company that made these machines and I can assure you that wineries where these machines were installed made a better wine.

Edit: typos, remember to proofread.

[–] mephiska@fedia.io 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There are machines tha, can control wine oxygen saturation way better, than a person, making the wine oxidation much more controlled.

this comma usage makes me feel like I'm having a stroke.

Sorry, typing on a phone and not proofreading does that, correcting it.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)