this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
621 points (98.6% liked)

Science Memes

15726 readers
1861 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Afaik its always going to have some parts of uranium right? 50% after one half life, 25% after two half lives and it will keep on halving practically forever (or till the last atom decays). In the end it comes down to when you consider it a negligible amount.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

after a certain point, you're going to get to where you have to split an atom or two.

fairly sure that'd be far less exciting than normal.

Edit: i decided to try and figure out how long that would take.. and per usual the law of large numbers caused my eyes to glaze over.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

half life times log2(amount of atoms), right?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I mean I didn’t get that far, I lost track of how many zeroes were in the half-life.

(It’s 704ish million, right?)

[–] JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 3 months ago

I mean, yes, that's how it would work if there were an infinite number of atoms in the piece. There's a finite amount, though, so eventually there will be a point when all the atoms have completely decayed.

All models are wrong, but some are useful.

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 months ago

Yeah, thats what I was using to get 14%.

2billion years is about 2.8 halflives, so I calculated (1/2)^2.8 ~ 0.14.