Video Game Arguments

61 readers

1 users here now

The harsh truth you can't handle about video games.

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

Arthur@hilariouschaos.com

Starfield is just No Man’s Sky with worse vibes and better lighting (hilariouschaos.com)

submitted 1 month ago by Arthur@hilariouschaos.com to c/vga@hilariouschaos.com

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Let’s be honest: Starfield is just Bethesda’s overpriced mod of No Man’s Sky. You’ve got planets that are mostly empty, endless resource grinding, and a storyline so dry it makes toast jealous. No Man’s Sky at least has color and a weird alien aesthetic. Starfield feels like a sad, gray PowerPoint presentation in space. Yeah, the lighting is nice. Congrats. It’s a boring game with RTX turned on.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Arthur@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah yes, “You didn’t like it because you didn’t try hard enough.” Classic cope. I played it for 30 hours. I tried. It just never stopped sucking.

[–] Kevin@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You put in 30 hours just to write this trash take? That’s like eating an entire cake and then demanding a refund because it wasn’t a cheeseburger. You wasted your own time and now you're mad the game didn’t morph into Fortnite for you.

[–] Arthur@hilariouschaos.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah, I’m mad I got sold a “space adventure” and ended up in a game where scanning rocks was a core mechanic. You can keep your glorified geology simulator.

[–] Kevin@hilariouschaos.com 3 points 1 month ago

And you can keep crying on internet forums for karma because you thought the galaxy would revolve around your toddler-brained attention span. Starfield wasn’t for you. That doesn’t make it trash — it just makes you the wrong audience with a loud mouth.