Fuck Cars
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
view the rest of the comments
Just an FYI, this person is not referencing the USA's approach to gun laws. My gut reaction to the title, unfortunately, was, "so this author wants us to start driving cars into schools, now?"
But even so, this idea is strange and wasn't fully fleshed out. Just because you take large SUVs mostly off the street doesn't make cars any less dangerous to pedestrians, and removing criminal offenders from the drivers seat does absolutely nothing to counter drunks, and certainly nothing about oblivious drivers or older folks that rightfully should never touch a steering wheel again.
Also, a smart car can still kill a person, especially at 55mph as they used in their example. Like, ok, maybe one turns a human into a pink mist while the other just breaks their neck and slides them across the pavement. As long as the gore is less, then the fact that both humans died doesn't matter I guess.
The higher the hood of the car, the more deadly it is. So yes, we need to be allowing only sedans and station wagons for regular drivers, and special licenses for trucks and vans
But have you thought about a suburban white male with a frigile ego?
I too am a myopic American and clicked through just to see WTF this author was suggesting.
Basic physics says that lighter vehicles have less inertia, that carries less force, that stops faster and causes less damage. Let alone the host of other benefits of smaller cars, environmental, psychological, societal etc.
I'm not denying that smaller cars are more sane, I'm just saying that no matter what a car that weighs over a thousand pounds, especially at any sort of speed, still has great potential to kill. Motorcycles that weigh less have hit and killed pedestrians.
Indeed - but that’s not the central issue here.
Traffic casualties, like running a reverse casino and deciding which games to include, are a matter of statistics.
Something that will kill you 9 times / 10 vs 4/10 will simply cause less deaths, the same for lesser injuries, less cost on society in general.
I don’t see the value of equivocating the two by ignoring their statistics.