this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
145 points (100.0% liked)
New York Times gift articles
1041 readers
85 users here now
Share your New York Times gift articles links here.
Rules:
- Only post New York Times gift article links.
Info:
- The NYT Open Team. (2021-06-23). “A New Way to Share New York Times Stories”. open.nytimes.com.
- “Gift Articles for New York Times Subscribers”. (n.d.). help.nytimes.com.
Tip:
- Google "unlocked_article_code" and limit search results to the past week.
- Mastodon: Use control-F or ⌘-F to search this page. (ref)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
“Wholly domestic” isn’t a thing.
It used to be, and it should be. Anything that has to be made or produced outside our own country should be seen as a luxury.
"Used to be." I'll assume you mean before Europeans arrived in 1492 and immediately started enslaving people, whose labor formed the majority of the value of the raw materials and crops they produced. Those people mostly disappeared because of new diseases that came over, so the slave labor was imported instead.
Hell, even the Bronze Age is named after the alloy formed by combining copper and tin -- from Tinland. People have been trading raw materials, and food/livestock, and manufactured goods since there were people.
And why does a national border determine what's a luxury and what's not? Why not state borders? Why not county, city? Why not just draw a line around yourself and anything that comes from outside that line is a luxury? It's entirely arbitrary.
even if your goal is valid, this is not the way to accomplish that
you cannot cut off your arms in expectation of immediatelly evolving wings
i respect your opinion. The issue is that without causing severe economic pain to businesses, they'd never change away from the way they've been accustomed to doing business. So, businesses essentially have to be forced to do business as they're told, or else close because they can't make a profit in the regulatory environment. There must be a cost to looking outside the country for anything whatsoever which makes the act of searching so onerous that they'll have trouble making a profit.
Frankly, it needs to be both costly and labor-intensive if this is going to work. Every business should have to justify to the government every foreign purchase, sale, or labor. And they should have to pay more for it than for any possible domestic version.
Let's pretend for a moment we all agree that each country should be almost entirely self sustaining and that this is even possible.
Now, how long do you think it would take for factories to be planned, designed, built, furnished and started? a day? maybe 2? or perhaps it would take years?!.... well it does take years but the tariffs are here now
So let's say you are a business owner and somehow magically have a piece of land lined up to buy, money and plans already made to bring production home. Tariffs are here now so you would be bleeding money while you build the factory... but wait, you invested in that plot of land and tariffs are removed 3 days after announcement... now it is still cheaper to buy your stuff abroad than ever build it here... what now? do you keep spending millions in a factory that will never be able to compete?
And this is from the business perspective. The consumers of the USA, whose salaries have been stagnant for 40 years, will now have to face the severe economic pain until all these magical factories pop up from the ground like we are in a sims game.
Even if the idea was not completely unfeasible, the way it's been implemented is beyond idiotic
That's just complete bullshit. A company doesn't need to spend millions of dollars in legal fees to figure out which tariffs apply today to understand that locally made products don't have tariffs. They need to know for certain that it'll be more expensive to import in the future than build a domestic factory. It takes years to build a factory, today's costs don't matter, the costs in 5 years do.
If the goal of the tariffs was to increase domestic production, they should have been phased in over time to give time for the factories to be built. The last month of chaotic tariffs meant that no company could figure out what production to move domestic. At some point in the chain, some things must be imported because they don't exist in the United States. If a product contains rare earth elements, some portion of it will be imported from China since they process 95% of them in the world. So the question isn't do we import it not, it's what piece do we import. If companies knew exactly what the tariff rates are going to be, it still takes years to build a factory. That process won't start until there's a cost benefit analysis between paying tariffs and building a factory, and that analysis can't start without knowing what the tariff rates are. With the tariffs being introduced, paused, resumed, cancelled within a month meant that no cost benefit analysis could be done because the costs might be wildly different tomorrow. Businesses won't invest if they're not certain the investment will pay off eventually, and with how chaotic tariff rates have been, no one can be certain, so no one is investing.
Tariffs can be used to spur domestic production, but the way they were used over the last couple of months is not going to. Just like any tool, they need to be used the correct way to achieve the desired results.
All of that would be possible without causing severe economic pain.
You can regulate through subsidies, tariffs, transport cost. If your goal is more domestic production and consumption you can do that without pushing market insecurity, arbitrary tariffs, etc. It's possible in a more planned and controlled manner.
When exactly did it used to be? We have archaeological evidence that stone age people kept long distance trade connections. Could you enlighten us as to when this fabled period of history occurred?