this post was submitted on 18 May 2025
49 points (100.0% liked)
Space
1286 readers
277 users here now
A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics
Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.
Related Communities
🔭 Science
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !earthscience@mander.xyz
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !physics@mander.xyz
- !space@beehaw.org
🚀 Engineering
🌌 Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Bigger heatsink would be the target, but you gotta get it up there. On moon is not a half bad idea. Bury the heatsink and use the moon itself might be the best idea, depending on how quickly it can absorb then dissipate the heat through the righlith. The side of the moon doesn't matter as there isn't an actual 'dark side' of the moon, just a side we can't see do to tidal locking. That side still gets the same amount of sun.