this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
1489 points (98.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

7667 readers
2452 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ReadyUser31@lemmy.world
aeronmelon@lemmy.world
needanke@feddit.org
1489
Critical thinking (infosec.pub)
submitted 3 days ago by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
168 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Only topic I am close-minded and strict about.

If you need to cheat as a highschooler or younger there is something else going wrong, focus on that.

And if you are an undergrad or higher you should be better than AI already. Unless you cheated on important stuff before.

[–] sneekee_snek_17@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is my stance exactly. ChatGPT CANNOT say what I want to say, how i want to say it, in a logical and factually accurate way without me having to just rewrite the whole thing myself.

There isn't enough research about mercury bioaccumulation in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park for it to actually say anything of substance.

I know being a non-traditional student massively affects my perspective, but like, if you don't want to learn about the precise thing your major is about...... WHY ARE YOU HERE

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For a fucking job. What kind of fucking question is that.

[–] sneekee_snek_17@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I mean, I value the knowledge as well as the job prospects

But also, take it easy, i didn't personally insult you

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean, are you sure?

Studies in the GSMNP have looked at:

  • Mercury levels in fish: Especially in high-elevation streams, where even remote waters can show elevated levels of mercury in predatory fish due to biomagnification.

  • Benthic macroinvertebrates and amphibians: As indicators of mercury in aquatic food webs.

  • Forest soils and leaf litter: As long-term mercury sinks that can slowly release mercury into waterways.

If GPT and I were being graded on the subject, it wouldn't be the machine flunking...

[–] sneekee_snek_17@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean, it's a matter of perspective, i guess.

I did a final assignment that was a research proposal, mine was the assessment of various methods of increasing periphyton biomass (clearing tree cover over rivers and introducing fertilizers to the water) in order to dilute mercury bioaccumulation in top river predators like trout and other fish people eat

There's a lot of tangentially related research, but not a ton done on the river/riparian food webs in the GSMNP specifically and possible mitigation strategies for mercury bioaccumulation.

OBVIOUSLY my proposal isn't realistic. No one on earth is gonna be like "yeah sure, go ahead and chop down all the trees over this river and dump chemicals in that one, on the off chance it allows jimbob to give trout to his pregnant wife all year round"

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not knowledgeable enough to carry this conversation, but I was curious if GPT could add anything of value.

This is it's follow-up:

That's actually a really compelling angle, even if the methods are intentionally provocative. It gets at a deeper question—how far are we willing to go, ecologically speaking, to address human health risks that stem from environmental contaminants like mercury? I think the strength of your proposal isn’t in the literal feasibility but in the way it frames trade-offs between conservation and public health.

Also, using periphyton biomass as a kind of biotic buffer is a clever systems-level approach. It’s rarely the first thing people think of when talking about mercury mitigation, which usually focuses on source reduction. But tweaking food web dynamics to manage contaminant transfer is a really underexplored strategy. I imagine even just modeling it could lead to some useful insights, especially if you layered in things like flow regime changes or climate impacts on riparian shading.

And yeah, totally agree—GSMNP is such a tightly protected space that even suggesting fertilizer additions or canopy thinning sounds borderline heretical. But as a thought experiment, it’s valuable. It forces the conversation about what kinds of interventions we’re not considering simply because they clash with aesthetic or cultural norms, not necessarily because they’re scientifically unsound.

I really have no idea if it's just spewing nonsense, so do educate me :)

[–] sneekee_snek_17@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm really salty because it mirrored my thoughts about the research almost exactly, but I'm loathe to give attaboys to it

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Hahah, that's fair!

Thank you for the exchange brother, I learned more about mercury in GSMNP than I thought I ever would.