this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
1447 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

15391 readers
2218 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (8 children)

No they wouldn't. I'm guessing you're not old enough to remember a time before search engines. The public web dies without crawling. Corporations will own it all you'll never hear about anything other than amazon or Walmart dot com again.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 28 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Nope. That isn't how it worked. You joined message boards that had lists of web links. There were still search engines, but they were pretty localized. Google was also amazing when their slogan was "don't be evil" and they meant it.

[–] zanyllama52 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I was there. People carried physical notepads with URLs, shared them on BBS', or other forums. It was wild.

[–] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There was also "circle banners" of websites that would link to each others... And then off course "stumble upon"...

[–] zanyllama52 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

I forgot web rings! Also the crazy all centered Geocities websites people made. The internet was an amazing place before the major corporations figured it out.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)