Board Games

1886 readers

2 users here now

Let's Play a Game! A place to discuss all things board game, regardless of genre. Everything from Scrabble and Catan to Ark Nova, 1830 and beyond is fair game! That means we have blackjack. Bring your own hookers, sorry.

Rules:

Play nicely with others here.
Discussion should be at least somewhat related to board games and all that entails.
Self-promotion is allowed within reason. Don't go overboard!

Other comms that might be of interest:

Other boardgame comms:

!juegosdemesa@feddit.cl (Spanish)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Profilename1@sopuli.xyz

AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works

AwesomeLowlander@sopuli.xyz

Blaze@sopuli.xyz

Board games with emergent complexity? (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 weeks ago by naught101@lemmy.world to c/boardgames@sopuli.xyz

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Some games are complicated - they have really complex rules. Examples of this are games where you have to track many different types of tokens, with different rules for each.

Other games have really simple rules, but still manage to produce extreme complexity in they way they are played.

Go is the perfect example of this. It literally has 2-3 rules, but because you can play anywhere, the complexity it can produce is wide and deep, to the point that tomes have been written on how to play it.

What other boardgames exist that have very simple rules, but produce complex and interesting game play?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think I agree that abstracts more often have this property, but I don't think there is a perfect correlation..

Chess is an interesting example, to me it's rule complexity is kinda medium-high. It definitely does have emergent complexity, and though I have a vast respect for it as a game, it just kind of bores me, and I think its because the ratio of emergent complexity to rule complexity is low... I dunno, maybe I'm just being a brat..

Backgammon and checkers are even less interesting, for the same reasons.

An interesting kinda-counter example is Regicide.. If you play the full game, it's 100% themed, and you can feel that even when you play with a normal deck of cards. But it does seem to have some interesting emergent-feeling property. Even though it's really just a slightly more complex multiplayer solitaire..

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I mean yes and no, you are just saying what lots of fans of abstracts claim makes them superior to other types of games... to which the rest of the board gaming community smiles bemusedly and goes on playing whatever type of game they find the most intriguing which may or may not be an abstract (it probably isn't).

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yes and no to which part? I'm not trying to claim abstracts are good...

I think that regicide is NOT abstract (not sure though), but still seems to have the property that I like..