this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
645 points (97.5% liked)

Mildly Interesting

21345 readers
244 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

if humans would be adapted to that it could work but it would mean without modern technology it would be close to impossible to survive without access to saltwater (most of human habitable land area)

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Well we were already adapted for it or at least our ancient ancient fish ancestors were we lost the ability that's my core point, salt isn't exactly rare and other minerals can be used to reduce osmotic pressure, but besides that 40% of all people live near salt water and ~30% of all land animals live near salt water so I wouldn't think that would be enough to lose such a valuable resource as water, I am obviously wrong since we can't drink salt water but it still feels like a miss step.

[–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 5 points 5 days ago

i guess in the case of humans we would have evolved for a long time to mainly eat fruit that has a high water content with low salt content possibly even being most of needed water intake. after starting to eat meat perhaps there hasnt been enough evolutionary pressure to be able to regain saltwater consumption ability

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 4 days ago

Evolution is very short-sighted, and not at all good at planning.