this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
507 points (92.5% liked)

Greentext

6640 readers
1189 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hikermick@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Bite your tongue. Like a lot of things from the past, they need to be viewed in context

[–] julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I mean they are objectively poor in a lot of ways, but you're spot on. At the time they were fricking mind blowing. Space opera/space cowboys on the big screen! Before that we had what? 2001 and star trek?

[–] Hikermick@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Yeah any decent sci-fi before Star Wars was heady with little action. Logans Run, Silent Running. Also in my mind I saw sequels in general change from shameless cash grab to better attempts