this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
216 points (98.6% liked)

Hacker News

2139 readers
357 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (13 children)

Still think the important issue is who's "butthurt" eh? That's why the country is doomed. The problem with finding a liberal candidate supported by the base is that memes can't run for President. Just go back to scrolling on your phone and keep telling yourself none of what MAGA is doing is your fault.

edit: I'm gonna expand a little for people who keep saying Harris was a bad candidate who didn't get the support of "the base". She got 75 million fucking votes, Trump just got 2.3 million more. The "base" voted for her just fine, it was the FRINGE who didn't.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (12 children)

πŸ˜‚ next time dont put a candidate up who supports a genocide, cant be bothered to support workers, and couldnt even break 5% in a primary and maybe your candidate will win.

The only people you have to blame for this is you morons who chanted vote blue no matter who and harris who ran a dog shit campaign.

Its like you dumbasses dont know the first thing about how reality works and unfortunately we're all suffering because of it

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

The way reality works is that you never get everything you want, and you often have to make the least bad choice available. Refusing to vote so you can maintain your own moral purity makes you the dumbass.

[–] LikeableLime@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The way reality works is that Dems run bad candidates and lose to Trump, twice.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Saying Harris was a bad candidate or that the Dems ran a bad campaign is objectively bullshit. When election day came she was second only to Obama in her rise in popularity, and doing it in only a few months is objectively amazing. But Trump's win can't be the fault of people who refused to vote for her because they focused on the Israel/Gaza issue and ignored every other fucking issue, can it? Naw, you were just being ethically pure. And how'd that work out for Palestinians? Really swooped in and saved the day there! I'm sure all the people getting deported would also want to thank you for being so ethical. Way to go! So would everybody who's gonna die because they won't be able to pay for their meds. And the ones who are losing their science jobs. And science itself - science is fucking STOKED that you have such pristine morals. Way to go!!!

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don’t think you understand what objectively means. She objectively lost.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

Ok, take out "objectively" and read the rest of the comment.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)