Funny: Home of the Haha

7579 readers

852 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

Other Communities:

/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Anticorp@lemmy.world

aeronmelon@lemmy.world

1431

Seems like the most reasonable explanation (infosec.pub)

submitted 3 days ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/funny@lemmy.world

75 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Microw@piefed.zip -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The thing that these kinds of comments always insinuate is "either Epstein pimped all these girls and young women to powerful clients who are on a client list, or otherwise no abuse happened at all!"

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Yeah but it very clearly is a joke - and one meant to point out how absurd it is to say that no abuse happened at all. No?