this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
1429 points (99.8% liked)
Funny: Home of the Haha
7579 readers
779 users here now
Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.
Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Other Communities:
-
/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Wait a second. You're saying this piece of evidence that would be the starting point to investigations of everyone on that list is weak?
And, that could very easily be combined with the videos, and only after substantiating evidence is found would anyone be charged with a crime.
That's how investigations normally work.
You take one piece of evidence, combine it with more evidence, and eventually you have a full case.
The Feds have the back book (and so does the internet, because it was leaked online). The feds also have a lot of video that I personally don't want to see, but it should be enough to connect at least a few names.
The fact that they refuse to connect any names means that Trump is in too many of those videos.