this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
947 points (98.6% liked)

Political Memes

8906 readers
2596 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Not defending a book. Calling out shitty arguments. Couldn’t give two shits about scary clown book. Care a lot about people using shit arguments that can be weaponized by bad actors.

Reading comprehension. Get some.

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You’re literally in here calling people pedophiles for suggesting that there may be some literary context to something that makes people uncomfortable.

[–] DeusUmbra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I don't think there is much of any kind of literary context that can defend writing multiple pages of children having sex in graphic detail, especially in a book where the sexual abuse of children is not a primary theme, nor anything regarding child sexuality being a major theme of the book. It literally just takes a turn from "children scared of scary clown" to "the 11 year olds all decide they Must pressure their friend into a gangbang so they won't die virgins" and then moves on from it entirely as if it never happened. The context of the story is entirely unchanged if you remove the scene, as we can tell from EVERY adaptation of the book into film.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)