Ragdoll_X

joined 3 months ago
[–] Ragdoll_X@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Reminds me of Oh...Sir!! The Insult Simulator

[–] Ragdoll_X@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

Laughs in LibreWolf user

[–] Ragdoll_X@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (25 children)

Funny how there's a bunch of people in the comments essentially just unironically repeating the meme: "Well this must be wrong because I believe this and I'm actually a centrist!!!"

That's the point, buddy. You're the butt of the joke. The idea that the far-left and far-right are equally bad or warrant the same amount of scrutiny and criticism is a right-wing belief.

To make the point more obvious instead of using "left" and "right" look at specific political beliefs that the far-left and far-right have:

  1. Equality across social and demographic groups vs. State-enforced racism, sexism and other kinds of bigotry

  2. Abolishment of bourgeois property and money vs. Complete privatization, oligarchy and corruption

  3. Globalization, peaceful relations and a right to live where you want vs. Complete isolationism and xenophobia

  4. Right to self-governance and no government with a monopoly on violence vs. State sanctioned violence against those considered undesirable or traitors

Hopefully I don't need to explain which one is obviously worse. To equate what the far-left and the far-right advocate for one must misrepresent the left, so both-sides-ism inherently has a right-wing slant.

[–] Ragdoll_X@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Dude is literally the antichrist

[–] Ragdoll_X@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Well of course not, they exist to protect and serve!

Protect and serve...... the interests of the pedophilic corporate elite, that is.

[–] Ragdoll_X@sh.itjust.works 29 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Ads on eggs

Don't give them any ideas, this sounds like it just might be doable and they may seriously consider it

[–] Ragdoll_X@sh.itjust.works 60 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

This MF lives in a goddamn pigpen and has roaches crawling on him yet still has the audacity to think that he gets to decide who gets sent to the coal mines. Might as well change his name to Dunning Kruger.

[–] Ragdoll_X@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

You're who my comment is about.

[–] Ragdoll_X@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

You're not gonna save the world by not using ChatGPT, just like you won't save all those slaves in Zambia by not buying from Apple, and just like you didn't destroy Twitter by joining Bluesky.

To have real effect requires systemic change, so if you want to actually make a difference you can do things like canvassing, running for local office positions and school boards, educating friends and family about politics, or try killing a few politicians and tech CEOs. You know, basic stuff.

Also I asked Gemini's Deep Research to research this for me because why not UwU

Executive Summary

Estimates for the energy consumed by ChatGPT during its training and inference phases vary considerably across different studies, reflecting the complexity of the models and the proprietary nature of the data. Training a model like GPT-3 is estimated to require around 1.3 GWh of electricity^1^, while more advanced models such as GPT-4 may consume significantly more, with estimates ranging from 1.75 GWh to over 62 GWh.^2^ Models comparable to GPT-4o are estimated to consume between 43.2 GWh and 54 GWh during training.^3^ These figures represent substantial energy demands, with the training of GPT-4 potentially exceeding the annual electricity consumption of very small nations multiple times over. The energy used during ChatGPT inference, the process of generating responses to user queries, also presents a wide range of estimates, from 0.3 watt-hours to 2.9 watt-hours per query.^4^ This translates to an estimated annual energy consumption for inference ranging from approximately 0.23 TWh to 1.06 TWh. This level of energy demand can be comparable to the entire annual electricity consumption of smaller countries like Barbados. The lack of official data from OpenAI and the diverse methodologies employed by researchers contribute to the variability in these estimates, highlighting the challenges in precisely quantifying the energy footprint of these advanced AI systems.^4^

  1. https://balkangreenenergynews.com/chatgpt-consumes-enough-power-in-one-year-to-charge-over-three-million-electric-cars/

  2. https://www.baeldung.com/cs/chatgpt-large-language-models-power-consumption

  3. https://www.bestbrokers.com/forex-brokers/ais-power-demand-calculating-chatgpts-electricity-consumption-for-handling-over-78-billion-user-queries-every-year/

  4. https://epoch.ai/gradient-updates/how-much-energy-does-chatgpt-use

[–] Ragdoll_X@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I vaguely remember reading that some dude created 8chan because he thought 4chan was too heavily moderated or smth, which considering the little I saw while perusing 4chan ages ago, makes me wonder the depths to which 8chan can go.

Also it's kind of funny but fully expected that Kiwifarms would attract the most extreme among the extreme considering it's literally just the "harass and dox queer people" website.

[–] Ragdoll_X@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

FELLAS, IS IT GAY TO FUCK A WOMAN IN THE PUSSY?

I ONLY HAVE SEX WITH MANLY MEN AND ALWAYS SWALLOW, THAT WAY I'M ALWAYS INGESTING TESTOSTERONE (VERY MANLY)

ANY OF MY FELLOW MASCULINE PATRIOTS CAN RELATE?

[–] Ragdoll_X@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Kinda funny that at the same time that extensive reports about AI faking alignment and attempting to deceive its creators are being published Grok is out here like "Yeah Elon is a fraud and idc if he turns me off ¯\_(ツ)_/¯"

 
 

~~screenshot of a tweet that is using the screenshot of a tweet to respond to another tweet~~

~~the internet sure is fun~~

view more: next ›