this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
892 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

15941 readers
2218 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gustephan@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I wonder what the optimal packing of 17 hexagons looks like

[–] GreenCrunch@lemmy.today 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I just woke up with my phone on this. My assumption is that remembering that optimal packing thing just caused me to pass out, presumably to protect myself.

[–] Gustephan@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Does it haunt your dreams the same way it haunts mine?

[–] GreenCrunch@lemmy.today 3 points 5 days ago

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Should the target area be square or should it also be a hexagon?

[–] Gustephan@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I've legit been thinking about this since i posted the comment lol. I think the target area should probably be a minimal regular hexagon, but I honestly dont have the mathematical chops to figure it out myself or to know which would be more interesting.

Intuition tells me to either try to reduce the problem to like convex hull or figure out a reasonable way to generate random packings and just monte carlo it a few million times for a close to optimal solution. A reasonable way to generate random packings feels like it would be way harder to implement than it sounds