this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
74 points (98.7% liked)

PC Gaming

13007 readers
575 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] passepartout@feddit.org 36 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

BioShock 1: GOAT

BioShock 2: also good

BioShock infinite: great visuals and gameplay, story was meh

We can extrapolate this further to:

BioShock 4: literally don't care.

What I care about though is Judas, the new game by former BioShock lead developer Ken Levine.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 6 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I'll play Infinite for the first time this year (maybe... it keeps getting pushed back in my backlog) and I am so curious about it. Some people say it's one of the best games of all time and some that it's overrated and meh.

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I played it earlier this year after having played the first 2 only (and that was 10-15 years ago). Infinite is a good game, graphics hold up beautifully. I wouldn't say it's one of the greatest of all time but it was a very good game regardless.

Probably there was a hype cycle at the time of its release that I wasn't aware of, as that's the only way I see it as being regarded as meh.

Honestly it's just more Bioshock, but set in the clouds rather than underwater, I liked the change of style.

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I love infinite but my problem with the game is that Booker (the main character/you) is really annoying IMO. I just want him to shut up and be a silent main character rather than some COD protagonist knockoff

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Agreed. Or give him more of a personality at least.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

All three games are master pieces in my opinion. 3 is just different from the previous two, so people dont like that. I say play them all and appreciate them for what they are.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Some people say it’s one of the best games of all time and some that it’s overrated and meh.

Hah, it’s in between.

It had a lot of nostalgia glasses haters, a lot of “GOTY!” industry marketing, and a few launch performance issues IIRC. But it’s a good game.

Won’t get more specific than that, other than just play it!

[–] JATtho@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

BioShock infinite was ok experince on linux, I have completed it twice. (The native binary runs via its own internal translation scheme, so I suggest running via dxvk/proton instead for more speed.) I would say however that it'll be a lot more hollow and straight forward "pipe run" than its predecessors. I own bioshock 2, but it's dead, obsolete M$hit only version that i haven't played since it eated my save files three times.

[–] passepartout@feddit.org 3 points 4 months ago

Same experience for me with infinite, forcing proton results in a better performance than using the native Linux build.

[–] invertedspear@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 months ago

I agree 1 was GOAT. They nailed weaving the story line in a way that made a railroaded story feel natural. 2 might as well have been a rails shooter, part of the story was literally on a railroad. If that was satire by devs and writers being coerced then bravo, otherwise it was weak. Infinite bright back a lot of what made 1 awesome, mesmerizing even, but the extreme patriotism thing got old real quick. The dimensional jumping storyline was on the cusp of greatness, but would have needed a few more DLC style side adventures to better tell it from other POVs.

4 is too late and implies more that they have no idea what else to do so back to this well and hope it’s not still dry.

[–] leave_it_blank@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

1 was advertised as a spiritual successor of System Shock 2, but it only got the atmosphere right. It was just another shooter which disappointed me. 2 was the same more or less. 3 had a fascinating story, but it was still just a shooter. Maybe 4th time will become what I crave for, another immersive sim!

[–] CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

Funny, i feel the opposite of Infinite: amazing visuals and story, gameplay was meh. Its gunplay just wasn't as good as Bioshock 1, but i love the world and Elizabeth's story.

[–] dankm@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Have you played the remasters? Are they any good? I got about 40% of the way through 1 and ran out of time. Wondering if it's worth restarting on the original or the new.

[–] passepartout@feddit.org 1 points 4 months ago

I have played the remasters of 1 and 2. I believe they are very close to the base game but a little more optimized / polished graphically speaking. So I'd say go for it. 40% is not nothing, but I played the first game 2 or 3 times until now anyway.