Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

3564 readers

295 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

WhoRoger@lemmy.world

RoyalEngineering@lemmy.world

Awa@lemmy.world

A salty twist: Diabetes risk study says french fries are a culprit (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/health@lemmy.world

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Weekly servings of boiled, baked or mashed potatoes weren’t associated with an elevated risk of Type 2 diabetes — but french fries were.

Craving french fries? Dunking your spuds in a deep fryer might be a recipe for elevating your risk of Type 2 diabetes.

According to a study published Wednesday in the journal BMJ, swapping out your weekly dose of frites for boiled, baked or mashed potatoes could lower your risk of this chronic condition.

The authors examined the diets of more than 205,000 adults in the U.S. who responded to questionnaires about what they ate over nearly four decades. Among those who consumed potatoes, the authors looked at which people developed Type 2 diabetes, a disease that leads to persistently high blood sugar levels.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] oktoberpaard@feddit.nl 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The way I read your post, I interpret it as saying that you can’t have diabetes type 2 if you’re eating such that your blood glucose levels are maintained within acceptable levels. However, I’d argue that you have type 2 diabetes if your body is incapable of regulating your blood sugar without dietary adjustments. It might very well be the case that eating low carbs, apart from treating the symptoms type 2 diabetes, might protect you against developing type 2 diabetes, but that doesn’t mean that the reverse is true: that carbs are the direct cause of type 2 diabetes. It might be true that low carb diets are one way to avoid becoming obese and therefore protect you against the effects of obesity on your organs, or that it might increase insuline sensitivity, but we can’t conclude from this information that carbs are the primary cause of developing diabetes type 2, even though it can (indirectly) contribute to it.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

diabetes type 2 if you’re eating such that your blood glucose levels are maintained within acceptable levels

This is the definition of type 2 diabetes.

that doesn’t mean that the reverse is true: that carbs are the direct cause of type 2 diabetes.

Agreed, carbohydrates are a necessary component of type 2 diabetes but are not sufficient by themselves.

we can’t conclude from this information that carbs are the primary cause of diabetes type 2.

I can, in so far as they are a necessary part of developing type 2 diabetes, t2d can be avoided by not consuming them. Type 2 diabetes is a blood glucose condition, there are multiple layers in avoiding that state. Removing carbohydrates is a guaranteed way, but not the only way, to avoid type 2 diabetes.

As far as I'm aware the various factors impacting insulin sensitivity (and thus t2d):

carbohydrate load
industrial oil consumption
fructose consumption
inflammation
exercise levels
carbohydrate and fat consumption : randle cycle inhibition

Though only carbohydrates are necessary for t2d, the other factors may or may not be present