this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
315 points (98.8% liked)

Television

1982 readers
302 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities

Television Communities

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.
  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.
  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.
  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.
  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.
  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags.

Matrix Link

List of Best Rated TV Series as voted by the Fediverse

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I don't understand, the only way it could lose 40 million is if it cost that to make, no? Colbert's salary is 15 million according to the first number I saw after a search. I don't see 25 million's worth in that show. So how can it "lose" that?

Or is it a case of "we projected 100 million in advertising but only got 60, still making a profit, but 40 less than we said"?

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

"We could have had the next Game of Thrones doing 200 episodes a year at 11:30pm every weeknight and made approximately a million billion gajillion dollars - anything less is a loss."

CBS's tax accounting team, probably.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

https://www.natesilver.net/p/why-colbert-got-canceled

Still, The Late Show has long carried a headcount of more than 200 employees. Many of them are likely quite long-tenured, protected by unions or by office politics. My experience with ABC News suggests that most of them are dedicated and highly skilled professionals, but some are also coasting, and the pay scale might not have much to do with their contribution to the bottom line. It’s not hard to imagine that they’re making an average of something like $250K per year per person, counting benefit packages, which are often generous at the big media brands.

Take 200 x $250K … that’s $50 million. On top of that, Colbert was reportedly making between $15 and $20 million a year. If Paramount was then allocating some costs to the Late Show for a dedicated studio on a prime block in Midtown, equipment for a show with a pristine production values, plus travel and accommodation for guests — considerably nicer, in my experience, than for your typical late-afternoon TV hit — you could easily approach the nine figures.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Wow, I had no idea that kind of head count was necessary to produce something like that.

[–] viking 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Other people on the show earn a salary as well, they might pay guests a participation fee, and there's also opportunity cost to consider if an alternative show has a potential to generate higher (ad-)revenue.

Still sounds unlikely.

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 5 points 1 month ago

There are other costs to running the show, but opportunity cost is not "losing 40 million".

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I don’t think GAAP includes opportunity costs 🤔