At this point there had already been more than seven years of information sharing between the government and the public. Trust was high which meant an efficient mass contact tracing programme could be introduced using QR codes. Tang ensured privacy was protected as much as possible by decentralising data, deleting it after 28 days and keeping it out of prosecutors’ hands. Taiwan never went into a full lockdown and, despite its proximity to China, there were only seven deaths from Covid-19 in 2020. This figure rose dramatically after a breakout among airline staff, but by April 2024, it still compared favourably with Britain – 19,005 deaths in Taiwan, 232,112 in the UK, which has a population only three times bigger.
I haven't read a fascistic headline coming from theguardian in a long time. Someone needs to remind Simon Hattenstone that if his writing needs to be burned, persecuted, and sent to deathcamps simply because Xi Jinping looked at him wrong.
Like goodness gracious, the internet is not yours to define what's toxic or not. Fuck your puritian Anglo crap, brit.
Did you even read the article? It seems like you have a very different interpretation of "toxic", which leads me to the question: do you think the internet is not toxic?
Anti Commercial-AI license
It is precisely because the article is about a person, and not about the internet, that it fails to answer it's own question. Unless detoxifing the internet is answered in her book, Simon failed to precise what he really wanted to headline about.
A less “toxic” headline would be: