No. She can't.
Privacy
Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient
Maybe the Taiwanese internet? But probably not the global internet. She's competing with nation states and political parties that use toxicity as a tool.
I haven't read a fascistic headline coming from theguardian in a long time. Someone needs to remind Simon Hattenstone that if his writing needs to be burned, persecuted, and sent to deathcamps simply because Xi Jinping looked at him wrong.
Like goodness gracious, the internet is not yours to define what's toxic or not. Fuck your puritian Anglo crap, brit.
Did you even read the article? It seems like you have a very different interpretation of "toxic", which leads me to the question: do you think the internet is not toxic?
It is precisely because the article is about a person, and not about the internet, that it fails to answer it's own question. Unless detoxifing the internet is answered in her book, Simon failed to precise what he really wanted to headline about.
A less “toxic” headline would be:
My English readers, meet Audrey Tang, the civic collaborator turned politician, that made a book about the internet.