this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
29 points (89.2% liked)

Space

1999 readers
66 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.


Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

For fun, I have attempted to de-word-salad it:

Near and far side of Moon look very different.

China’s Chang’e-6 mission retrieve first-ever samples from Moon's farside.

Chang’e-6 mission brought back 1,935.3 grams of lunar regolith from the far side’s South Pole–Aitken Basin. Samples successfully returned to Earth on 2024-06-25.

Study of the regolith yields four Nature papers:

  • Prolonged Volcanic Activity: Analysis identified two distinct volcanic phases on the lunar farside—4.2 billion and 2.8 billion years ago—indicating that volcanic activity persisted for at least 1.4 billion years, far longer than previously thought.
  • Fluctuating Magnetic Field: Measurements of paleomagnetic intensities in basalt clasts revealed a rebound in the Moon’s magnetic field 2.8 billion years ago, suggesting that the lunar dynamo, which generates magnetic fields, fluctuated episodically rather than fading steadily.
  • Asymmetric Water Distribution: The farside mantle was found to have significantly lower water content than the nearside mantle, indicating that volatile elements are unevenly distributed within the lunar interior.
  • Mantle Depletion Signatures: Geochemical analysis of basalt points to an “ultra-depleted” mantle source, likely resulting from either a primordial depleted mantle or massive melt extraction triggered by large impacts.

Reference: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09131-7

FTFY. I'm surprised at how much shorter it got.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Thanks for condensing. Interesting read.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

♥️

Also, could the near side have more water because it splashed off of Earth?