this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
53 points (100.0% liked)

Ask

930 readers
103 users here now

Rules

  1. Be nice
  2. Posts must be legitimate questions (no rage bait or sea lioning)
  3. No spam
  4. NSFW allowed if tagged
  5. No politics
  6. For support questions, please go to !newtolemmy@lemmy.ca

Icon by Hilmy Abiyyu A.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I could see where, if the trailer has good brakes and a relatively light load, it could provide additional stopping power.

That's usually not going to be the case though.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm reasonably sure that you'll never stop sooner, you'll likely be exceeding the traction from the tires at that point anyway.

The trailer wasn't braked.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It is my understanding that there are two types of brakes you'll find on trailers, the ones activated by a weight that swings forward under the force of the truck's braking, and electric ones. Neither are anti-lock or anything fance, and neither are really designed to provide actual stopping power, the drag they add is meant to help maintain control. Most of the braking force is done by the truck's front wheels.

I don't think it's impossible for there to be a spot on the performance envelope where you'll stop a few feet shorter with a lightly loaded trailer, but I bet it's not particularly large.

It is impossible with a trailer with no brakes.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Hence the "stupidest thing" :-)

There might be a way to load a trailer with perfectly spherical chickens and brake a certain way that maximized braking performance to... get a MythBusters result.

I assure you, that argument is exclusive to this forum, and wasn't part of the dialog in the car at the time :-)