this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
29 points (96.8% liked)

Fungi: mycelia, mushrooms & more

411 readers
1 users here now

This is a community for information and discussions on

And so much more.

Some related local communities

Some related communities from other instances are:

Credits


Posts and comments from Meta or X will be removed. More info here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Human activities have left a detrimental impact on the Earth and its environment – from oil spills leaking into the ocean to tons of plastic products overwhelming our landfills. Even if we were to alter our habits completely, much of the damage we have caused cannot be fully reversed. Researchers have tested numerous techniques to reduce the amounts of contaminants and pollutants in our environment, but many of these methods are expensive and time-consuming, yielding slow results. Fortunately, there may be a solution hiding right below our feet: fungi.

Known for their skills in biodegradation, fungi are typically thought of as organisms that break down organic matter – possibly decaying trees, fecal matter, or dead plants and animals. However, different types of fungi can also decompose, filter out, or absorb not only synthetic matter but also toxic compounds and contaminants. Scientists have been using this unique quality in fungi in a process called mycoremediation. This method may help clear our soil and water pollution and tackle our immense plastic problem.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Doctorbllk@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

An organism with plentiful nutrients and no natural predators in an environment will proliferate as an invasive species. This is, in fact, worth considering as a Jurassic Park scenario.

These folks are not saying "we shouldn't do this because of the risks." They're saying "I hope those who would take this action attempt to understand and control those risks before an adverse affect like unnatural proliferation were to occur."

You can both be right.

[–] SteveKLord@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

That’s much more thoughtful and constructive than any other comment. Thank you. I absolutely agree that two things can be true at the same time and risks are worth considering. That was not the feedback I was receiving however. I do believe the primary and most important threat to be considered here is plastic pollution and the article proposes something to aid in combating it. Who is right shouldn’t be the foremost concern in a healthy discussion. We can adjust how we implement solutions, absolutely, but shooting them down entirely gets us nowhere.