Bonus Randeeeee:
this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2025
544 points (95.9% liked)
Illegalism
261 readers
47 users here now
Illegalism is an anarchist philosophy which embraces criminality as a lifestyle. It's the second part of the renowned and enlightened charter: "Be Gay, Do Crime"
This is a place for exchanging tricks & experiences, discussing trends & events, sharing shitposts, and connecting criminality to theory & praxis.
Guidelines
- Be sure to follow the Anarchist Code of Conduct
- Probably try not to incriminate yourself (or others)
- No planning or calls for specific actions
- Make your own debate post if you want to debate the efficacy or ethics of illegalism
- Please consider providing alt texts for images
Rules
- No Lame-Os
Resources
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/category/topic/illegalism
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Here in Statesia we built "rest stops" on the side of the Interstate were you could stay overnight but have to move on. They're wonderful on a 5-day roadtrip, but if you have to live in your car, they're a reliable toilet, maybe water and one night's decent sleep i guess? I don't know, I've never thought about it in depth. They always seem too far from civilization here to be any use to the unhoused.
Kind of on purpose!
my brain says it's part of that whole Eisenhower Interstate System thing where they made part of the interstate usable as runways every so often, but i'm tired and high and my brain conflates shit when that happens and now i'm too lazy to look shit up.
The runway thing is false
Explaining the interstate highway system and why it exists feels so fucking pepe sylvia meme.
This may be an over simplified version but it's not that crazy to imagine that after fighting a world war where maneuver warfare and mass logistics became even more important than before the USA would want to work on improving those capabilities.
What's more crazy is how it absolutely fucked up communities of color and ruined so many lives in the name of segregation labeled as "progress."
Still, Eisenhower as president, looking through the lens of a general, saw the need for an efficient means to move men and material in war and how great it would be for the peacetime economy too.
At least that's my understanding but I'm open to correction.
Nope. Look up why napoleon³ did it in paris. Same thing.
There's a bit of tye 'moving military shit' thing, but Eisenhower was jniquely positioned to know how trash roads were fpr that. We still use trains today. And we as a culture and government hate trains.
Roads are great when you need to move something only a few miles and every family has a car or cars and the suburbs are getting built out.
It wasn't just for military use, agreed, I just know that was part of it.
Was largely for militsry use, just not in the way you think.
Well highways do make sense as a concept, having a network of highways between major urban areas and other places of interest is good.
What doesn't make sense is having highways EVERYWHERE, making them more than 3 lanes in either direction (even this is a sign that you have way too much traffic and need to move that onto railways), and especially running them through urban areas.
Only someone dumb or evil does those things.
it is fun to look for the little airplanes painted on the side of the highways though
having been homeless, yeah rest stops basically only exist to make getting from one unwelcoming town with a gas station to another a little more comfortable for people with somewhere to be. we have built our hatred of the nomadic cultures of north america into our hatred of the poor. or more accurately, we hate the poor and then define the poor by the qualities we seek to enforce. because the thing to understand is that the people whose land we stole and the people who we stole from their land to make this country weren't poor until the aristocracy redefined them as being poor
Well put. The indigenous people in America were anything but "poor".
If we go a little further south and look at the Aztec, they were basically the wealthiest nation in the world at the time. Even by European standards. Reading primary sources from the first Europeans encountering them makes this really clear.
The US government not only redefined the indigenous people as poor, but fucked their material conditions to the point where redefinition was no longer necessary.