this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)

MTG

2357 readers
22 users here now

Magic: the Gathering discussion

General discussion, questions, and media related to Magic: the Gathering that doesn't fit within a more specific community. Our equivalent of /r/magicTCG!

Type [[Card name]] in your posts and comments and CardBot will reply with a link to the card! More info here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] andrew@mtgzone.com 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I find this to be a pretty crappy argument and outcome. Essentially it’s a lame duck standard with Vivi completely warping the format for 2 months because we need to “think of the RCQ players.” Doesn’t even acknowledge how many will not play an RCQ because of this crappy meta.

So play Vivi or anti-Vivi the next few months (or get destroyed) then replace your deck when Vivi eats an all but certain ban. Great plan.

I find it more alarming that they’re doubling down on the overall ban strategy. While they plan to add a few more times during the year, they’re still dodging the real issue. They won’t acknowledge that turbo charging cards over 18 sets in a standard window will require (quite a few) emergency bans!

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

What are you talking about? Vivi's fine. Didn't you see "the 2nd-place Mono-Green Stompy deck from this Magic Online Challenge"?