People Twitter

8289 readers

1192 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

579

Calling BS. Pics Or It Didn't Happen (infosec.pub)

submitted 3 weeks ago by miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

179 comments fedilink hide all child comments

xcancel

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 58 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Already proven a hoax

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 57 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

Clowns all of them.

Apparently the bullets did have some engravings, but they said benign shit like "Here fascist, catch!" and "If you read this, you are gay LMAO", but nothing antifa or trans related

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What's the Source: ?

I wanna share it with others who still believe it's true

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 45 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

On September 11, 2025, The Wall Street Journal issued a caution regarding its earlier report on an internal law-enforcement bulletin concerning the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk. The bulletin had mentioned ammunition found near the scene with “transgender and anti-fascist ideology” engravings, but the Justice Department indicated the report might not accurately reflect the messages on the ammunition as the probe was in its early stages.

This is statement from the WSJ

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So they walked back their own claim, good good good.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

They're walking back a claim that was so stupid that it could only be made up by a conspiracy theory idiot.

Yet they made it. Top notch US journalism here people

Now they're somewhat walking it back but that doesn't matter, that walking back part will be ignored, the damage has been done

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yup, it was said, now it is truth to a lot of people

[–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Probably the person making the more believable claim.