this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2025
88 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

7034 readers
2 users here now

All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.

See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC


Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This way, when the pendulum swings in the other direction and they try to take advantage of us again by showing their support, we can point to the record and show people that it's not sincere.

We shouldn't allow them to play both sides of the fence like this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Queer owned businesses aren't ones that 99.9% of people interact with on a daily basis. I doubt there are 5 queer owned businesses that are publicly traded.

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It wouldn't be queer owned if it was publicly traded. It would be owned by shareholders.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That's a load of shit. Being queer owned doesn't preclude you from capitalism.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, but what exactly is a load of shit about the above statement? Capitalism =/= publicly traded. For a business to be both publicly traded, and queer owned, there would have to be some sort of covenant preventing shares from being sold to non-queer people. I don't think that would actually be legal?

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Capitalism and publicly traded are like 3 sides of the same coin.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Uhm, what? Like, come on, I hate capitalism as much as the next queer person, but you're just spouting nonsense. Twitter isn't publicly-traded, does that mean it doesn't participate in capitalism?

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you have an actual question there?

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nope, from the first reply I was mainly calling you out for rudely saying something untrue. I think you're just turning your hatred for capitalism against other queer people, and I think that behaviour sucks.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're significantly misunderstanding me, but that's fine since I won't support trans people anymore since you think I'm an enemy.

Might as well be the person I'm portrayed as instead of the person who wants trans people to survive as long as possible.

...that's fine since I won't support trans people anymore since you think I'm an enemy.

If it was apparently this easy for you to stop supporting trans people, then you never did to begin with. No idea where all this came from though, seems you just have a bee in your bonnet (haha, get it? because we're on beehaw).

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 4 points 1 week ago

I truly dont understand this comment.

[–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bad management is still a thing. And I'm not against using the levers of capitalism to force businesses to be queer-accepting and prove that queer-phobic managers are incompetent from their numbers.

This isn't a replacement for taking down capitalism, but still a tiny victory.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] diffaldo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Maybe this is my bias but I think they find a job easily after the things cooled down.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not 100% bulletproof, but what is?

I'm viewing it like climate change -- every little bit counts.