this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
283 points (98.0% liked)

movies

1863 readers
141 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  • Both Syndrome and The Screen Slaver in The Incredibles
  • Killmonger in Black Panther
  • Magneto in X-Men

All those were villains only because of their methods, not their goals.

[–] trslim@pawb.social 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Nah Syndrome was a megalomaniac who sold advanced weapons to governments for money and committed genocide over a childish grudge from 15 years ago. Sure, Mr. Incredible was a dick to him in the beginning, but that doesn't make him right.

Even if some heroes like Gamma Jack were dangerous to society, that doesn't mean it's ok for Syndrome to go on a rampage.

[–] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 13 points 1 week ago

He told a literal child to stay away from a serial bomber, after said child was refusing to take no for an answer.

Frankly, a few stern words and a cold shoulder was extremely restrained.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

His stated goal was to spread his technology so that everybody could be equal to supers. It was supremely egalitarian. What's wrong with that?

The whole "murdering supers for revenge" thing was just a side quest to make sure the audience understood he was holding the villain ball.

[–] trslim@pawb.social 9 points 1 week ago

I think his genocide thing outweighs the whole egalitarian thing. I mean he launched a terrorist attack on a major population center all so he could be the hero. Syndrome has zero regard for human life.

His whole everyone is equal thing is solely so he can twist the knife into the backs of remaining supers because he hates them that much, he doesn't actually give a damn about equality.

[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

His stated goal was to spread his technology so that everybody could be equal to supers. It was supremely egalitarian. What’s wrong with that?

Depends where you stand on gun rights vs gun control I guess lol

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

God made man, ~~Colt~~ Syndrome made man equal.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

What about gang violence?

[–] dariusj18@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I'm not convinced that Killmonger did anything wrong, the idea that he would be imprisoned after having his throne usurped is the great tragedy of the ending. He chose to die instead of being a political prisoner to a usurper.