this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
235 points (97.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34965 readers
1537 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm seeing a bunch of posts about how Google has decided to stop allowing side loading on Android phones. But the EU relatively recently forced Apple to do the exact opposite. Won't they just do the same thing for Android phones? Sure, people outside the EU market will lose this ability as a default, but presumably you can just order a Euro phone on ebay if you are outside the EU.

So why is everyone panicking? I think Google is definitely being shitty by trying to do this, and I support the development of other open source alternatives. I like the fact that this could be a big wakeup call for that effort. But I am wondering if this is also not as big of a deal as everyone is making out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cron@feddit.org -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Android will still allow sideloading in future. They are making it harder, but compared to Apple (even in the EU), their new policies are still more open.

For example, you will still be able to download an APK from github (as long as it is signed, which generally is the case when the app is available on google play) - but you can't do this with an iPhone.

Edit: Everyone is panicking because nobody knows Google's next move. Maybe they will restrict which apps are allowed, maybe block some apps they don't like (like unofficial youtube clients), or block sideloading completely in a future release.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

most open source apps are not available on the play store, most developers will not accept having to hand over their government ID to google, and this will stop most future open source developers from creating anything for android

people are panicking because what we know so far is bad enough already

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You seem to not know what you're talking about. I trust F-Droid and their interpretation of what Google is doing and what I have read from Google about what they're doing, and you aren't quite grasping it.

[–] cron@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I trust f-droid too. Their approach to building apps is truly at risk. But as of the Google blog article, installing apks is not affected as long as they are signed.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

The apk on f-droid already must be signed by the developer or f-droid. The problem is developers don't want anything to do with google. If they wanted to submit their personal details to Google, they'd already use the play store?

https://f-droid.org/2023/09/03/reproducible-builds-signing-keys-and-binary-repos.html

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 days ago

"as long as they are signed"

As long as you want to pay the fee and have your identity and address verified and get big brothers permission to have it signed. A lot of people who make apks don't want to do all that so they can freely release their apk for the appreciation of anyone who would want to use it. "As long as they are signed" is nearly gatekeeping away anyone who wants to make a program without monetizing or gaining from it in any way.

[–] tankfox@midwest.social 0 points 6 days ago

I'm going to go ahead and say that 'side loading' is something that does not require approval or authorization from the owner of the system that does the 'regular loading'. So if it requires google authorization, it's not 'side loading', it's alternative regular loading. Your attitude is very 'segregation won't affect you if you're white'.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, this is correct. What F-Droid worries about is that a lot of open source apps aren't signed and that the developers don't want to verify their id with Google, which would prevent distribution.

[–] ShouldIHaveFun@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

All APK from f-droid are signed. Just not with a key approved by Google.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] ShouldIHaveFun@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But doesn't f-droid build and sign with a repository key themselves (therefore prooving that the app comes from the source)? If this is the case only f-droid repos would need to validate a key with Google

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago

Potentially, but I doubt Google would accept it.