politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
That works out to what, something like 20% of all Americans?
Close-ish...
It’s that same core of 30% that apparently want to follow the GOP straight to their own graves. As much as Trump is the current problem, there needs to be a reckoning with this rot sooner or later.
It's normal human variation.
A chunk of any group of humans just wants someone to confidently tell them what to do.
Unfortunately intelligence and confidence is usually an either/or thing.
Someone who knows their shit and is intelligent is aware of possible flaws with their plan, and is pre-emptively coming up with possible fixes if needed. They will never be 100% confident.
But an idiot with no idea what they're talking about?
That's exactly the type of person to always be 100% confident.
Our monkey brains are wired to think that if someone is that confident, they'd be dead if they weren't also capable.
Generational wealth/power isn't unique to humans, but inherited wealth/power is. With everything else if the powerful parent is gone, the nepo kids lose all status.
That's the disconnect from how we evolved and how we currently live. Especially when we stop educating people so they can think past instincts
Think of that one guy in the office who is just average. Does their job OK, but your life is better when you don’t have to interact too much with em.
Not really all that interesting to talk to. Maybe has some dull hobbies, probably not all that deep into them. Drives a midsize sedan or a minivan. Can do some household repairs so long as it involves a hammer or duct tape: Probably likes to mow the grass as a good pastime. Sits a lot, enjoys watching the TV. Hasn’t read a book in years.
Now realize that 50% of the population is him or worse.
Hell, 16% of people think nuclear war would be a good idea. So yea, morons.
This one goes out to you, Dan.
You know what Stuart? I like you.
https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=71PNZH1OaW0
I think the same percentage of people approved of Nixon even as he got on the helicopter to fly away, an absolute disgrace. It's probably the exact same people in some instances, certainly the exact same type of people...
W probably had similar numbers, and was why his supporters were given the "out" of the astroturfed and completely fake, teabagger movement. The "Tea Party" doesn't exist any more than the "Democrat (sic) Party" does.
I don't know if Taco will go out with similar numbers, but I think something will be done in the aftermath to give these people an out. In the aftermath of Nixon there was no real "out" for the voter, but the rabid right wing set to work on building Bullshit Mountain so that they'd never have to worry about a mainstream media telling their voters something they didn't want to hear...
Hmm that suggests the remaining ~10% must be from non-Republicans which is really depressing. I suppose he might have fans in the anti-vaxx movement still and a certain percentage of those are non-Republicans so maybe that explains it.
Edit: Just did some napkin math and it comes out to ~12% of non-Republicans approving of him.
It's probably the "alternative medicine, don't trust doctors" crowd, which traditionally wasn't a particularly right-wing thing but then merged with the right around the pandemic/QAnon time. Some of them must have been left behind.
You can't just add up D and Rs and expect to get total population...
A bunch of Americans still don't identify as either.
That's why I specifically said non-Republicans.
Edit: here, I'll walk you through the math. The article says 70% of Republicans approved of him and 33% of everyone approved of him. Republicans make up ~30% of the population. 70% of 30% is 21%. That leaves 12% unaccounted for (33-21). So 12% out of everyone both approves of him and doesn't identify as a Republican, while 21% out of everyone both approves of him and identifies as Republican. The remaining 67% of everyone doesn't approve of him whether or not they identify as a Republican.