this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
57 points (98.3% liked)

PhilosophyMemes

244 readers
165 users here now

Memes must be related to phil.

The Memiverse:
!90s_memes@quokk.au
!y2k_memes@quokk.au
!sigh_fi@quokk.au

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

doing nothing is committing nothing. I can't read the original Latin, so maybe there is a nuance lost in translation, but this is tautologically a falsehood.

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 2 points 3 hours ago

If a child was drowning in shallow water and you were the only one around to help, I think you would be morally obligated to do you best to save them. Doing nothing would be committing something

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

If you're not a fan of the Gregory Hays translation, you can always go with:

He often acts unjustly who does not do a certain thing; not only he who does a certain thing.

Oxford Edition trans. Christopher Gill, https://lexundria.com/m_aur_med/9.5/lg

or

He who acts unjustly acts unjustly to himself, because he makes himself bad.

George Long trans. https://classics.mit.edu/Antoninus/meditations.9.nine.html

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah that’s also a contradiction. You can’t act by inaction.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago

the Oxford version also creates a contradiction, and the long translation seems to be saying something else entirely.