this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
246 points (96.2% liked)

Witches VS Patriarchy

1025 readers
560 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

In the interest of historical accuracy, 'they' burned men and women as witches. Notably, in Iceland nearly everyone executed as a witch was male.

[–] grober_Unfug@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

World wide 75% of killed persons accused of witch craft were women.

Just in the interest of historical accuracy.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 hours ago

women and their allies 😬

[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today -3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

World wide 99% of military deaths have been mentioned. Theres murder, death and tragedy everywhere. We're all victims.

If you disagree I'll call you a witch...or recruit you.

[–] grober_Unfug@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 18 hours ago

Why would I disagree? This here is about witches though. Let’s stay on topic.

[–] nightmare786@leminal.space 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

then there's Giles Corey ... not burned, but pressed to death

[–] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 2 points 14 hours ago

Oh no, that’s where the saying “I’d be hard pressed to do —“ came from, isn’t it.. (not that specific event but the uh.. method?)

People are horrible. Colloquialisms are (usually) horrible.

[–] gid@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for pointing out the one exceptional case where women didn't comprise the majority of people murdered. That really helps!

🙄

[–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's really just something that I learned recently and thought was interesting, which happened to be relevant to this post.

[–] stray@pawb.social 5 points 17 hours ago

Just in the interests of everyone getting along, I think you should have opened with that context. Your first post sounds like you're arguing that women weren't oppressed or something. It was interesting to read about though, and I'm glad you shared it.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

An entire ideological movement forming around a widely believed historical inaccuracy?

I think that's called a religion.

[–] november@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 19 hours ago

What ideological movement are you talking about?

Please elaborate what exactly falls under “widely believed historical inaccuracy”?!