this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
239 points (96.1% liked)

linuxmemes

27553 readers
461 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

    Someone correct me if I’m wrong here but Ubuntu is based off of Debian, therefore Ubuntu based distros are actually Debian based?

    Or do they all have the same snap integration like Ubuntu does?

    [–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Ubuntu is Debian based yes. Not all ubuntu-based comes with snap (for example Mint). Sometimes I think "why are there so many different distros? We only need like five of them", but then, sometimes I think it's a strength, each distro exploring a new direction to see what works.

    [–] deczzz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

    To follow up, how come e.g. mint decides to base their distro on Ubuntu rather than Debian?

    [–] beyoublahaj@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

    https://www.linuxmint.com/rel_gigi.php

    "LMDE 7 is based on Debian 13 Trixie. Make sure to read the Debian release notes."

    [–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

    Back in the day, ubuntu used to be the most user friendly distro. Linux for humans. It has a faster release cycle by not following stable debian releases. It had hardware support that you had to jump through hoops in debian to get. A great community. It made sense to base mint on ubuntu.

    That's about where things were when I started using Mint about 11 years ago. Ubuntu has kind of strayed from that obvious choice to hand to newbies. Mint has been sitting around saying "No, we're not doing that, because it's user hostile" on anything from Gnome to Snap.

    [–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

    We only need like five of them

    We only need one. And that's Arch.

    [–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

    Do you think you would have that opinion if you ran arch on mission critical production servers for a couple of years?

    [–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

    Well it was a joke, but it is a myth that Arch is unstable.

    [–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

    Well, for the sake of clarity, lets separate stability and reliability? Stability means unchanging. Reliable means it won't crash or behave in unexpected ways.

    [–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

    lets separate stability and reliability

    And how do you propose we do that? Is reliability not dependent on stability?

    Stability means unchanging

    No, it means how stable something is. Literally.

    Reliable means it won't crash or behave in unexpected ways

    Funny, that's how most folks around here describe stability.

    You're just using words to be honest.

    [–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

    If you have a better word for the concept of unchanging functionality and interfaces, I'm open to using that in this context. In describing distros, I've only come across the word stable for this. Reliable is a wider concept to me, and also includes being relatively free of bugs. A stable distro can still be buggy, if it's the same bugs tomorrow as yesterday.

    [–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

    Now you're just using more words, which means you're either a bot or you've lost your train of thought. You're rambling.

    What is your actual point here?

    [–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

    You wrote "It is a myth that arch is unstable". Arch, being rolling release, is by definition changing. This is, imho, the opposite of stable. This is why it's important to use precise words. I have no interest in continuing this discussion since you don't seem to argue in good faith.

    [–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

    So, rolling release means Arch is ever changing, thus its unstable? You forget that other distros still change - with bigger, less regular updates which are often more disruptive and just as dangerous.

    There is truth in saying bleeding edge causes problems but that's down to the user, not Arch. Arch assumes that the user knows how to prevent a cluster fuck.

    And, there are ways to mitigate such a cluster fuck. Arch LTS, update less frequently, avoid AUR etc.

    In the end tho its just easier to neg on Arch.

    [–] mittorn@masturbated.one -1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

    @jobbies @pmk arch means you cannot omit any update. If you do notsync pacman, you will not be able install any package (because they removing old versions from servers very quickly). If you sync pzcman and not update entire system, it will possiboy break on any package installation

    [–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 0 points 17 hours ago

    Are you assuming that's news to me? What's your point?