this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
315 points (89.1% liked)

World News

32285 readers
1 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] astral_avocado@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Can we please stop overusing the word genocide

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 55 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sorry, you're right. In the absence of specific genocidal intent, the US and UK are only guilty of crimes against humanity, the crime of aggression, and various sundry war crimes.

[–] astral_avocado@programming.dev -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Yes, correct. Now Saddam Hussein on the other hand..

Edit: oh you're one of the hexbear people, jesus you people are insufferable

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 54 points 2 years ago

I agree with you and you resort to whataboutism in response. Somehow I'm the insufferable one?

Yikes.

[–] Schooner@lemmy.ml 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah killing millions of people was totally worth getting one man!

Now let's bomb Washington DC to rubble and kill your family so we can get to Bush, the even bigger war criminal.

[–] astral_avocado@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Did I say I think we should have invaded Iraq and Afghanistan?

[–] MemesAreTheory@hexbear.net 25 points 2 years ago

Nah you just pearl clutched when we called Western Powers bad names.

I'm loosely in favor of restricting the use of the word genocide to when it's definitionally appropriate myself, but that's in the context of effective communication and clarity. So long as "genocide" is going to be used exclusively to refer to US State Department desginated enemies only, then it's perfectly reasonable to liken the US/France/UK's horrific foreign interventions genocide as well. Western interventions, both formal and clandestine, have killed many more than anyone else those imperialist fucks have accused of the word, so in the interest of showing just how absurd their usage is yes, we should and can call Western powers genocidal too.

[–] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 33 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Also you: https://lemmygrad.ml/comment/1081955

When you say it like that sure, except they also deny the Uyghur genocide and ignore the fact that China has their internet walled off and heavily censored/policed.

Basically they’re so pro-communism that they looped back around and are now pro-fascists and drink the Kool aid. Not to mention the fact that China is only communist in name lol

[–] astral_avocado@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Yes this is me, thank you for advertising my accurate comment. China is indeed targeting and concentrating minorities into camps. Words have meanings.

[–] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Does not seem like words have meanings. All the nuance in your tank is reserved for the constant America-led warmongering in the middle east with a death toll in millions, many more displaced, and known torture sites like Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and god known how many more black sites. Meanwhile the Uyghur are unequivocally being genocided despite ZERO CONFIRMED CASUALTIES four years into the news cycle. So your litmus test for genocide seems to be US foreign policy despite the emphasis on words having meaning.

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago

astral_avacado said elsewhere that the Iraq Invasion was just "misguided" so its definitely a case of us-foreign-policy with how they decide what is and isn't a genocide.

[–] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 24 points 2 years ago

Calling that genocide is holocaust denial.

Stop hiding behind pathetic labels, you are in bed with fascists.

[–] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 years ago
[–] Willer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago

lets call it unsolicited special underage child pregnancy operation