this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
198 points (99.0% liked)

World News

50226 readers
1842 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] QuadDamage@kbin.earth 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] rozodru@piefed.social 2 points 17 hours ago

because it'll still cost money to move them to like Newfoundland or whatever.

This is Marineland, in Niagara Falls, you can't just "release them" unless you want 30 Beluga whales going over the falls.

Plus releasing them is just killing them. They'll likely die in the wild.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If they were born and raised in captivity their odds of survival are pretty low. Like someone who always lived in a large city and never went camping being dropped off in Alaska odds of survival.

Rehabilitation only helps so much without the actual experience of growing up with other members of their species in the wild.

Edit: Of course the adults in the wild are the ones that survived until adulthood so I still lean towards attempts to rehabilitate and release, just noting it isn't as simple as releasing.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Their odds of survival in the wild are higher than being euthanized by a billionaire in an animal hostage crisis.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Captive animals don't always do well being released in the wild.

[–] Cybersteel@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why not let the rules of nature decide? Unlike human society, that lets the weak rule the strong, only the strong may survive in the wild. That is natural selection.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not natural selection if we yanked them out of the natural order and kept them from acquiring the skills necessary to survive in the wild in the first place.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you consider people as part of the natural order, then it is in fact natural selection. This isn't a commendation of our place in nature.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

People always say this as some sort of "gotcha" statement, but what we do to them is clearly very different from their normal life cycle and something we have the will to stop doing or somehow make up for the damage unlike other natural events like volcanoes erupting or meteors striking.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 hours ago

How different is it than ladybugs and aphids, except for we (think we) have the will to do better than our nature demands? Also, I think I made it pretty clear that I don't think that stance does our species credit. But I would say the outcome is very natural, even if natural isn't exactly desirable.