this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
189 points (100.0% liked)
History Memes
727 readers
1067 users here now
A place to share history memes!
Rules:
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.
-
No fascism, atrocity denial or apologia, etc.
-
Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.
-
Follow all Piefed.social rules.
Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world
founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
History is full of great triumphs alongside great atrocities. From a 21st century viewpoint, their hypocrisy is both terrible and obvious. Does that downplay or nullify the major achievements that were started and then built on, even while they were hypocrites?
Can't wait to hear how our society is judged in a few centuries. I mean we could probably do some of that now, and even begin to improve if we wanted.
I'm never sure of what the goal is in this topic. If it's educational and a reminder that we should always question our actions and morality, that's fine. But it's often phrased in a way to try and discredit the Founders, which seems dishonest.
There's a scene in the series John Adams where Franklin and Adams are reading over Jefferson's draft of the DoI, and the topic of emancipation is brought up. Franklin suggests that while it's an important topic to be raised eventually, trying to wrap it in with seeking independence from Britain would defeat the purpose of creating the needed solidarity among the colonies (as some were far more dependent and pro-slavery). I'm sure it's dramatized, but might be based on some writings of theirs.
We ought to discuss how often the ball of freedom for every person was dropped over time, from that period to the Civil War/Reconstruction to Jim Crow and even still now. We've never gotten past it fully as a nation, and seem to be regressing (again). A mention again on how we're going to be looked at by our descendants for what we're doing right now, it's not a great image in a lot of ways.
Probably revolted at human overpopulation, the biggest and root cause of, amongst other things:
factory farming and industrial fishing, which slowly tortures to death 2-6 trillion fish every year, and enslaves 2-4 trillion animals (mostly fish and chickens) in torturous conditions every year;
mass-extinction causing anthropogenic climate-change;
#2 and #3 circle back to #1 really, and #1 is thanks to advances in medicine but also hugely by the invention of fertilizer based on... petroleum. New time traveler quest unlocked: go back to the Carboniferous period and unleash microbes to decay things faster.
I mean, I noted that over half the Founding Fathers were outright abolitionists, and that Washington was of a similar thinking.
The hypocrisy is hard to deny for the slave-owners, however (Washington included), and Jefferson and Madison were unambiguously pieces of shit for their positions on slavery in a time when slavery was becoming increasingly contentious.
Abolitionism was gaining traction, and it would have been optimistically great if it had taken hold with a new country and leaders spearheading that change. However I would note that while the fight against slavery was growing then, look where we are with inherent racism that's stemmed from that divide, STILL, even after all the strife and war and political fighting.
Honestly, if the cotton gin had been invented just 10-20 years later, we might have ended up with a very different America.
That sparked a memory of someone's video or something that actually explored that alternative history, and the conclusion was it wouldn't have changed the slavery part, just how they were used. I think it was AlternativeHistoryHub?
Now maybe have a society that was already anti-slavery before colonization would have worked, but then you have to go back and change even more stuff before they got here.
The thing is, the reason why slavery died in the North and not the South was not exclusively moral, but largely economic - slavery had ceased to be economically viable in the production of most agricultural work. The cotton gin made cotton, a very labor-intensive crop, immensely more profitable, and you see a sharp reversal in the lukewarm growth of abolitionism in the early US South compared with the post-1800 US South, to the point where, by the 1830s, slavery was more entrenched in the South, both economically and philosophically, than it was 40 years before.
The whole subject of colonial economics and such is very complex, so I'll just say that your point does sound valid, I just don't know if that alone would be enough. But one thing you did raise, how morality wasn't the main factor... so really most everyone back then were assholes when it came to different races. Which supports my point that overcoming that would take far more than a few leaders casting away their slaves, and like I said, we still have racism issues in the damn 21st century where things ought to be so much better logically.
Maybe humans just suck collectively.
I get what you're saying, but... it's hard to get over the fact that Jefferson owned slaves, raped at least one of them, then enslaved the kids that resulted. Just saying that nobody's perfect doesn't really help us understand how someone could enslave their own kids.
This is a valid concern. My answer is: I think that the complexities and ambiguities of real history are far more instructive than the good/bad dichotomies of simplified legends. The American revolutionaries were bad people in a lot of ways, but they still managed to achieve something impressive. Therefore we, who are also deeply flawed, can also aspire to do good things.
Yeah, I tried not to frame it as we should forgive the immoral actions just because they did some good things. I think we can multitask and recognize both aspects of the person.
How dare you give a subtle, nuanced, accurate take on history!