this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
480 points (97.1% liked)

Trans Memes

2379 readers
134 users here now

A place to post memes relating to the transgender experience.

Rules

  1. Follow lemmy.blahaj.zone community guidelines.
  2. Posts must be trans related.
  3. No bigotry.
  4. Do not post or link to pornography.
  5. If a post is tagged with a specific gender identity, keep the conversation centered on that identity.
  6. Posts that assume the viewer’s gender and/or contain potentially triggering content must be spoilered and tagged at the beginning of the post title. Example content-warning tags that you can copy include the following:
  1. Mods can be arbitrary.

Because it apparently has to be said, this community is supportive of all forms of DIY HRT.

Recommendations

  1. Include other tags in posts for example:
  1. Include image description when possible.
  2. Link to source

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It's "LEGO", "LEGO sets", or "LEGO bricks", not "legos"... Other than that, you do you fellow human.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 month ago (3 children)

And yet you still understood what she was saying. Curious...

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you don't use the correct term, the king of Denmark himself shows up to your house to pop your head off.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No gods! No masters! Death to all monarchs! 😤😤😤

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Actually, I'd like to see you try. HM King Frederik is a former frogman (Danish navy seals) and still runs marathons at 57.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.

[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

jusd bcuz u cane undrstnd itt, dousnt maek itt korecct

[–] tmyakal 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There is no "correct." Language is constantly evolving. The only thing that matters is being understood.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'm so tired of the "this ain't English class" mentality about articulating oneself. It's one of those "freedom of speech isn't freedom from judgement for it" issues with me. You're free to only care about making yourself understood, and I'm free to think you're intellectually lazy for it.

[–] tmyakal 1 points 1 month ago

So what's your stance on AAVE? Or ASL? Or even just regional dialects where the fizzy drink is called pop versus soda? What is your one guiding light on how English is supposed to be, and who adheres to it?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago

They weren't saying "this ain't English class," they were saying that languages evolve. Which is true.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're not tired, you're uneducated on language and how it works.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago

I mean, I didn't say that. You can always educate yourself.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Language is evolving doesn't absolve you from misusing someone's name. I get that some names get a commonly used shortcut, like Robert becomes Bob, but would you keep calling Robert Bob, even if Robert had asked you not to? Would you insist on using Bob, in the name of linguistic evolution?

[–] tmyakal 2 points 1 month ago

Here's the great thing about toys: they can't ask me to call them anything. I can get a Buzz Lightyear doll and call it Woody. I can build a Millennium Falcon out of plastic blocks and call it the Serenity. Since they are toys I own and not sentient beings, I am not offending them.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's not a matter of understanding, it's a matter of using the proper name.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

bruh, they're patented plastic bricks! You getting this uptight about "proper language" only makes me want to lowercase label them out of spite. Good luck for when you run into people who literally never capitalize anything.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not patented since 1978. The bricks have been defended under trademark and copyright provisions of IPR law, but the patents have long been obsolete.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Akshually the proper name is "LEGO®", so you wouldn't say "LEGO bricks", but "LEGO® bricks".

Since ® isn't pronounceable this does unfortunately mean you're not allowed to mention LEGO® in spoken language, but that's a small price to pay.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

False, the name is Lego or LEGO. The ® just tells you that "LEGO" is a registered trademark.

If you want to best me at pedantry, you have to try harder ... and being right would also help you.

Why are people having such difficulty respecting an entity's chosen name?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because I could not care less about somehow offending or disrespecting a fucking corporation.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's because you're not Danish. Lego may be a just another faceless corporation to you, but for us it's part of our identity. The name was chosen by one man, for his wooden toy business, and the company is still owned by his descendant. I've lost count of the number of times I've visited Legoland and I've known people in multiple departments of the company. Same goes for a lot of Danes, if they haven't worked there themselves.

So it's not disrespecting some corporation, it's disrespecting a bunch of Danes as well.

What I'm curious about is why you feel so strongly about this. I've tried hard to be nothing but courteous, while not backing down, and you decide that not only do you need to tell me you don't care, you need to cuss as well. I get a sense that you do care, I mean, why else respond so forcefully? Are you OK friend?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is anybody fucking ok right now?

I say Lego, generally, but I think it's silly to care that much, especially when it's about a corporation. One of the main things shamelessly ruining our planet at the moment.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is anybody fucking ok right now?

Nope

I say Lego, generally, but I think it's silly to care that much, especially when it's about a corporation.

I know it seems silly, I might even agree that it is. But as I mentioned, Lego is so ingrained in my identity as a Dane that I can't not speak out. Why keep going then? The noble answer would be that people shouldn't be able to win arguments by just turning up the aggressiveness. But in reality I'm procrastinating something else.

One of the main things shamelessly ruining our planet at the moment.

If you truly believe that every corporation is evil and is ruining the planet, then fight back. And I don't mean by misusing a name, I mean pitchforks and guillotines. Rise up and seize the means of production... In the meantime please leave the essential part of my childhood that is Lego alone.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

You mean Legos?

Lol sorry, I had to.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

False, the name is Lego® or LEGO®. The ® just tells you that "LEGO®" is a registered trademark.

FTFY

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, sorry, a search for Lego in the Danish business registry will show you that the ® isn't part of the name https://datacvr.virk.dk/soegeresultater?fritekst=lego&sideIndex=0&enhedstype=virksomhed&size=10

A single entry includes (r) and it's an independent third party.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't know what to tell ya, bucko

Nice, now do a refresh and another screenshot before editing the page

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago

I do not respect corporations. Legos. They are legos.

[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is linguistic prescriptivism, and it's generally frowned upon by modern linguists

The simple act of a term being common and understandable often makes it correct, especially in informal situations

The only people who care about these things are people online who feel a need to correct everything and marketers

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 4 points 1 month ago

Literally every single person I've ever spoken to about them in real life has referred to them as legos.

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

I love playing with legos! <3