this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
1099 points (98.7% liked)

politics

26150 readers
2535 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Independent Senator Bernie Sanders floated Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as a potential presidential candidate in the 2028 elections, saying that even though it's "her decision to make," she is a "very, very good politician."

Speaking to Axios, Sanders said that he has been "out on the streets with her" and noticed how she responds when people come up to her. "It's so incredibly genuine and open."

Ocasio-Cortez is seemingly positioning herself to run for higher office, whether it is challenging Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for his seat or to make a run for president.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A female president of a normal age would be an amazing change for the US. Why does it always have to be geriatric males?

[–] yonderbarn@lazysoci.al 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

People thought the same when Obama was running.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Problem is, politicians tend to retire after the presidency. Obama could still be a really good senator, but that somehow never happens. So my fear about an AOC presidency is that it would cut her political career short. She's already great in the House.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah, that would be a shame. Although the shift in direction we could see switching from a Vance-run crumbling Trump regime to AOC would have SO much potential to do good for the US and the world that losing a couple decades of her as a vote in congress would be a bargain. Plus even in retirement she'd have a huge platform to influence hearts and minds.

Standard caveats and disclaimers apply, of course. That goes for everything from the 28 elections happening, to the US still existing, to the Earth's biosphere still existing. ^__^

[–] fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She’s already great in the House.

Yet a lot more is necessary to fix the fascism in the US...

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

True. And her presidency could also inspire more people like her to go into politics. I retract my doubts. Go for it.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Andrew Johnson did that

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

t would cut her political career short.

You mean early retirement?
Oh no, the tragedy... who'd want that?

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Her voters, perhaps.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Easy to forget that 2008 was just three Democrats running for a book deal and twelve Republicans running to be Pope

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

America is incredibly sexist. And racist.

As much as I would love for her to change things up, the reality is America isn't ready to elect a woman. She simply won't win. We need a male candidate, especially against the current testosterone driven gop. A woman simply won't convert vites from gop to democratic, it just won't happen.

Nothing will convert gop to democratic. It's the Trump cult. We need someone to get out the vote with the people who failed to vote last time, perhaps bring in some disillusioned leftists who can compromise.