this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
6 points (54.5% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8182 readers
6 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’m using it extensively, for instance, I have to create contracts with businesses that I work with, and AI is really helpful, works within minutes, and I don’t have to get a lawyer involved (I have sufficient legal know how, to be able to check the texts). I ask Claude.AI many questions, which help me to find out about any kind of topic (eg I wanted to know more about mobile nuclear reactors and got a quick summary within seconds). Naturally, you should take nothing at face value, blindly believing AI won’t do you any good, AI does not replace your brain. I create marketing materials and personal profiles with the help of AI, and I’ve also improved my CV. I have even used it to write a message to a friend who lost their son to cancer, I truly was at a loss for words, but AI helped me to come up with some useful sentences (which I personalized). All in all, it is extremely useful, even to answer questions here on Lemmy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Idk. Speaking from my own experience, it's not very clever. It might save you the time and money for a lawyer now. And maybe some time later make something up, you'll blow a contract and loose $20,000 and you wish you had paid an expert. Or it doesn't happen, that's something we can tell with hindsight. And depends a lot on how complicated the contracts are, how well you check them, if the other party is a greedy company or some random grandma... But I'm willing to agree with the premise. Usually people -for some reason- need to be subscribed to one of the extremes. And there are things AI can do if people use it to their advantage and are aware of the limitations... I suppose if it works for you... it works for you. I'm having a bit of a hard time because it adds loads of inaccuracies and errors to my computer code and I ended up putting in quite some extra time into things I previously did myself in a fraction of the time. So I use AI for select tasks which aren't an exact science. Like draw the logo for the prototype, or generate filler text, or come up with 10 creative ideas for gimmicks to add. That's something it's able to do for me.

I guess I'm not entirely okay, though. I've lately tried to contact a company who "outsourced" their customer support to AI. And I guess it also works out well for them, they probably don't need to pay anyone to staff the hotline anymore. But their customers are properly fucked now. Took us several days, some trickery and luck to get hold of a human and achieve something. And that's the flipside if companies use it to save money.

[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't want it to be clever.

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

...because you fear for your job and don't want it to be capable enough to do it? Or fear the robot apocalypse? Or because you have applications which don't require artificial intelligence to be intelligent?

I mean on its own I think it's a bit of a stupid opinion. You kinda want the Waymo on the street to be clever enough not to run you over as a pedestrian. That'd be bad and hurt at minimum.

[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It was a joke about the robot apocalypse, but thanks for jumping to the you are stupid conclusion.

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Alright sorry, I didn't mean to say you're stupid, just the opinion without any hint for me to understand... So I mainly didn't get the joke. But yeah, I feel for the robo apocalypse. Though I think it has to get considerably more intelligent to get anywhere close 😄