this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
421 points (99.8% liked)

Games

21858 readers
171 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
421
Japan Patent Office rejects Nintendo application relevant to Palworld dispute, cites games like ARK as prior art after third-party submission (gamesfray.com)
submitted 2 days ago by misk@piefed.social to c/games@sh.itjust.works
52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stray@pawb.social -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you really want to do something, and you're watching everyone else enjoy it on social media, that takes willpower. You only have so much willpower, so why not use it on something that actually helps someone, like not eating meat or child shave chocolate or whatever?

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But you realise you could swap the Nintendo games with child slave chocolate and this discussion would have played out just the same. What makes one boycott more likely to succeed than another? That's setting aside the fact that you're assuming everybody will have the same set of social values as you.

[–] stray@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We're taking about pirating the games, not buying them. Not buying them is still voting with your wallet.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wouldn’t you want to skip Nintendo games so that they stop being culturally relevant? I often hear that piracy is good for media creators in the long run.

This is the message we were replying to

[–] stray@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, the one responding to a suggestion to pirate their games, which directly references piracy in the quote you pasted.