Actually, as you can see from my figures, I put the fathers, uncles, brothers in the same category as the intimate partners - the home category.

I was assuming that family and partners/former partners would be at home and the friends, acquaintances and strangers would be met when they went out. You can take issue with that certainly, but I didn’t put her dad in the stranger category.

Ah, youre one of them....

Anyway, I think that we can agree that being alone with a man is perhaps where the risk lies for women, whether that’s at home or outside.

No, I dont think we can agree on that sexist statement. Being alone with a man is not automatically or inherently dangerous. The vast majority of men are safe, and sexual violence is committed by a small minority.

Around 2-10% of reported rapes, are found to be false. So, thats the number. But when talk about rape, we include non convictions when we talk about men and rape. I was once falsely accused of rape. I wasnt convicted because there was no evidence that I had done it. But I wasnt able to clear myself either, because how the fuck do you prove a negative??? My story, is one of those used to inflate the number of rapists out there. Because my story falls under "not convicted". Do you see the problem? Sexism means that we account for those who were convicted as "rapists who got away", but not "liars who didnt get caught". So, with this in mind, is being alone with a woman is where men risk their freedom??? Of course not. That would be fucking stupid. Wouldnt it? Because basing my opinion of woman around what a minority of them do would be... whats that word again... Oh yes, sexism! And thats what you are pushing here. Sexism.