this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023

166 points (99.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers

1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

KenBonesWildRide@hexbear.net

Nakoichi@hexbear.net

itsPina@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net

InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net

166

Libs: nuclear horror won't be so bad (i.imgur.com)

submitted 2 years ago by DoobKIller@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

102 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SootyChimney@hexbear.net 34 points 2 years ago

The reality is: Nobody is sure, any nuclear bombing is species-wide suicide at worst, an insanely pointless gamble at best. The vague consensus seems to be it would take a maximum 100 warheads to irreversibly destroy ecology worldwide, some suggest it would only take a few modern warheads. I suggest we do all we can to not fucking find out.