this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
264 points (99.6% liked)

Privacy

3189 readers
121 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An engineer discovered that the manufacturer can remotely brick his smart vacuum for not collecting data.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Even worse still, if you don’t allow them this intrusive data, they remotely brick the device you own.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There needs to be a law stating companies MUST notify you that "this product won't work if data collection is disabled" on the outside of the box

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Lol sure, "let them do whatever they want but it should be ILLEGAL not to write it on the box!"

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No no, I absolutely agree that shit like this shouldn't be allowed in the first place. But the issue is most people I've met genuinely do not care. They are okay with the amount of data being collected by their corporate overlords.

At the very least stating that a product won't work if it isn't connected to the internet allows consumers who do give a shit to know what type of product they're dealing with.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Corporate execs ought to go to prison for that.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago

s/prison/the guillotine/