this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
92 points (98.9% liked)

World News

50886 readers
1704 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Authorities in Denmark are urgently studying how to close an apparent security loophole in hundreds of Chinese-made electric buses that enables them to be remotely deactivated.

The investigation comes after transport authorities in Norway, where the Yutong buses are also in service, found that the Chinese supplier had remote access for software updates and diagnostics to the vehicles’ control systems – which could be exploited to affect buses while in transit.

Their investigations found that remote deactivation could be prevented by removing the buses’ sim cards, but they decided against this because it would also disconnect the bus from other systems.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We used to have vehicles that didn't need over the air updates for over a century. If they had a problem then a technician could simply perform an onsite diagnostic. Why the hell are we keeping them in a network like they're computers or no longer supported IoT dongles?

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Location tracking, diagnostics, statistics, security. Etc. it’s not a bad idea… for a bus. Less desirable IMO for a personal car.

This issue is that the manufacturer, or any third party, just has full access. Specifically China, who has a long history of being shady in tech.

Anything government related should really be on a closed system, even if it’s “wireless”

[–] monogram@feddit.nl 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

All of this stuff could be open source and hardware verifiable with arduinos but no, let’s outsource it to china

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] NaibofTabr 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Location tracking, diagnostics, statistics, security. Etc. it’s not a bad idea… for a bus.

There's no good reason for any of that to be updated while the bus is on the road. It should be done at a service location.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The good reason is that this way, they can click a button and push the update to hundreds of buses at once, instead of having to have them all come in one by one. That's a huge number of man-hours.

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Won't somebody think of the savings?

Key Points

Jeep Wrangler 4xe models crippled by faulty UConnect over-the-air software update.

Issues caused vehicles to lose power leaving owners stranded.

Incident exposes risks and inadequate testing in modern software-defined vehicles.

https://www.autoblog.com/news/jeeps-latest-software-update-can-disable-your-suv

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Some of these people never had to manage a fleet of computers.

[–] NaibofTabr 3 points 2 weeks ago

I have experience managing multiple network systems with user-facing endpoints. That's irrelevant.

Nothing critical on a passenger-carrying vehicle should be remotely managed and it definitely should be frozen while the bus is in active service. The last thing a crowded bus in motion needs is the lights randomly going out because someone decided it was time for a patch install.

The right choice from a security and safety perspective is for any wireless interfaces on the vehicle to be read-only - they can send data out (like current location). Pushing software changes should require direct physical access, and should only work if the vehicle is parked. Anything else is a stupid unnecessary risk.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

A vehicle shouldn't be part of a 'fleet of computers' period.

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes an over the air update without being in maintenance mode should not happen in any vehicle. In fact, I think there should be a hardware switch to prevent this.

[–] NaibofTabr 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The simplest solution is to just restrict software updates to direct physical access, and put the USB port or whatever behind a locked service panel.

If the software can't be infiltrated remotely, then there won't be any security issues that are so urgent they need to be patched in the middle of a shift, they can wait for a maintenance stop.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Also no good reason for it top be connected to the canbus or have any control or even monitoring of vehicle systems.

A GPS tracker needs access to power, that's it.