619
Death of beloved neighborhood cat sparks outrage against robotaxis in San Francisco
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
619 points (96.0% liked)
Technology
76730 readers
1548 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ai has a proven track record of causing less accidents, and killing far fewer animals per km traveled than the average driver.
92% fewer accidents involving animals than the average human.
Ai doesn't drink, get distracted, or smoke meth like the ml mods.
link from the article https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-05-16/woman-gets-millions-after-getting-dragged-by-self-driving-taxi-in-san-francisco
People get jail time, what do we do with machines?
Hold the manufacturers and operators (specifically for company operated) accountable?
The machine is the product, not the operator. We don't jail classic cars either. We hold their operators accountable. The one in control. Self driving has a shift of who is in control - now "indirectly".
if only that were the truth.
these companies will attempt to settle for bottom dollar or drag it out so long you'll have to go homeless to pay the legal fees.
there is no justice left in the legal system. justice isn't just blind anymore, she's been decapitated.
So in conclusion, it's not AI that's the problem it's the legal system?
why not both?
Accountable for what killing a stray cat? Come on if you don't want your cat to be hit keep it inside. I don't get how people think it's ok for a cat to wander. Even though it's probably illegal.
The comment I replied to expands from a cat death to a person being dragged. It expands to general accountability.
Public transportation does this too and isn't controlled by some company trying to make graphs go up
Don't worry. A lot of places are also trying to privatize their public transportation.
There are also a lot of people out there that will intentionally swerve to hit an animal. Mark Rober made a video a long time ago where 6% of drivers went out of their way to hit animals that were just chilling on the shoulder.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-Fp7flAWMA
fucked up that people do that.
And have a nice habit of being turned off before the accident so the AI didn't cause the accident. Numbers are bullshit.
I believe these cars drive on the same roads all day, whereas people are likely to be driving in and out of areas these systems are not familiar with. I suppose a good comparison would be of a taxi driver that only operates in the same area as the driverless cars, if that exists.
here you dropped this
your figures (though I doubt them) don't include the skew of driver vs driverless vehicles. of course driverless cars are 92% less likely to have an accident involving animals. that's because driverless cars account for less than 1% of the entire vehicle population.
but it does randomly hallucinate.
The vote question would be better suited for the admin team and not mods, as we are just over this community.
Too many people being nasty in this thread, so we've removed the negative comments for rule 3.